• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe because I’m high, but you just made me ugly laugh on the bus. I just saw fireworks. And now I’m remembering that plan I had to go back to the early 90s, and buy stock in yahoo. But through a telephone error, I ended up buying cases of yoohoo instead. Still worth it. I got to go back in time and see a micheal jackson concert when he was still black, and a Nirvana concert back before they were heard of.

      Still though…to be a billionaire.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Two wallets. 10k BTC each. These wallets were created back when BTC was 78¢. When you spend $10k the IRS might ask questions. If you are “structuring” correctly you avoid spending $9,999 and $1 within a short time span or even in the same reporting period. 10k BTC back then was something you could buy that looked like it wasn’t $10k but was really close. Spend it twice in two different wallets and if there are enough other transactions no one will notice.

    Anytime you see a transaction or set of transactions that add up to or are just shy of 10k USD, BTC or pretty much anything, there should be a little bell that dings in your head and causes you to think “this person is clearly thinking about US tax reporting laws and trying to dodge them.”

    Who had all that money back in 2011 that decided that now was the time to tap those wallets that are worth a billion each? Obviously someone that hasn’t needed the money until now. Someone that is planning on spending up to 2 billion. But not right away because if you try to sell 20k BTC in a hurry it will draw attention and potentially destabilize the currency. But you could sell it all off over the next year or longer without flooding the market.

    Who wants to spend up to $2 billion in the next year? What could you buy with that kind of money? Elon musk spent ~$250 million getting Trump elected. That’s just an eighth of $2B. You could buy a lot of super PAC power with $2B. You could bankroll the primarying of every Republican that voted for OBBB. Weird that these wallets were dusted off so close to Elon saying he would primary anyone that voted for OBBB, and he has a strong affinity for crypto, and he had enough money in 2011 to buy that much BCT on a whim, and that he wouldn’t have had to touch it to pay other bills as BTC went from 78¢ to more than $100,000 over the last 14 years.

    I wonder who these wallets belong to and what they will be used for?

    This is what conspiracy thinking looks like. It’s me. I’m the one conspiracy thinking.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Btw, banks will flag multiple transactions of $9,999 even if the reporting threshold is $10k USD. Structuring to avoid the $10k reporting requirement is well known and no guarantee of remaining under the radar.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It can be, if they’re fairly close in time and total just past 10k.

            Every bank has their own algorithm and they try to ride the line between catching criminals and not having too many false positives.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I worked in a bank for a bit. Literally any transaction that’s large and unusual for the account will be flagged. Also people do bonkers things with their money for the stupidest reasons all the time so all that one has to do if they’re making large transactions is be prepared to talk to the bank and explain what’s going on.

            Unless of course you are handling money in relation to organized crime, in which case you were fucked the moment the money touched the banking system

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The feds also like to criminally prosecute people if they do transactions that can be construed to be avoiding the reporting limit.

    • 46_and_2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is what conspiracy thinking looks like. It’s me. I’m the one conspiracy thinking.

      That’s some quality reasoning and conspiracy thinking 👍

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s some quality conspiracy thinking!

      But there are too many people who could have been early adopters and have any number of random motives for this to be “likely.”

      Heck, I was watching Bitcoin when it was like $0.002 a coin and someone spent 10,000 (presumably home-CPU-mined) BTC to buy a pizza. There were a ton of people there at the beginning, the barrier to purchasing a ton was very low, and unlike me, a lot of them certainly had $20,000 to spare and believed in it enough to buy.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sizable inactive accounts that wake up after years of dormancy draw investor attention because of the potential market impact if those coins are sold.

    It would make me very happy if they liquidated and destroyed the market overnight.

  • Scrollone@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds fishy.

    What if somebody found out the private key for those accounts? Like, brute forced them?

    Is it even technologically possible?

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bitcoin private keys are 256 bit long. That means, there are 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 (1.15*10^77) possible private keys.

      Say you are using a bitcoin miner that’s roughly 4x as fast as the curretly fastest one at 1PH/s (1*10^15), they you’ll need roughly 1*10^62 seconds or 3*10^54 years.

      Lets say you got a million of these miners, then you are down to 3*10^48 years, or 2*10^38 times as long as the universe has existed.

      I was going to calculate how much electricity this would consume and how expensive it would be, but the answer to that is plainly “too much to imagine”.

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was going to calculate how much electricity this would consume and how expensive it would be, but the answer to that is plainly “too much to imagine”.

        Purely hypothetically speaking, but, what if someone had their own private Dyson Sphere generating electricity? (Asking for a friend.)

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          The power consumption would be 5*10^62 Wh.

          The sun outputs 3.9*10^26 W. If you captured all that energy with 100% efficiency, you would need 1.3*10^36 hours or roughly 1*10^22 times the age of the universe to collect enough energy.

          That’s incidentally roughly the estimated number of stars in the universe.

          So if you put a dyson sphere around every star in the universe, right after the big bang (ignoring that stars didn’t form instantly after the big bang) and you ran them until today, then you’d have just about enough energy to crack one wallet with current tech.

      • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s if you were to try to bruteforce the entire keyspace one key at a time. Nah. You’d look for sidechannel attacks which could reduce the keyspace by many orders of magnitude before starting.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        At that point though the whole concept of bitcoins will be moot. If quantum computers can crack lost wallets they can also crack active wallets, and at that point there’s no reason to buy bitcoin at all, which will tank the value of bitcoin making it mostly not worthwhile to crack wallets.

        So if we get to that point, there will be one proof-of-concept wallet crack, and instantly after that bitcoin will cease to exist in any relevant fashion.

        • Inucune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s a window between the proof of concept success and Bitcoin being worthless where the attacker could attack any wallet and collect/sell while people figure out what is happening. The only question at that point is do you attack and sell aggressively to beat the clock, or do you slowly and carefully attack to try and stay under the radar? If one person has the ability to break crypto, then it follows that other people working towards it only have to align the same pieces before the window shuts.

          Crypto is and always has been a scam.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Considering that you’d need a paradigm-breaking revolutionary and incredibly expensive device to do so, I’d find it hard to believe that you could stay under the radar with it.

            What I’d expect to happen is that some big corporation and/or university manages to build a quantum computer capable of breaking 256bit encryption, and quite instantly after the announcement bitcoin will tank into nothingness or will change the algorithm to something quantum-computer safe. Well before some shady actor will get their hands on a quantum computer to crack wallets.