AsoFiafia

I guess I should have been more wordy to help YOU understand… I bought an older vehicle so it’s not connected AND is easy to work on myself, if need be. I bought a ‘79 because I love that body style of that specific make/model, it runs like a dream, does everything I need it to do, cost me almost nothing to purchase it, there was no tax on the purchase, the insurance is cheap as heck, the body is almost perfect, et cetera.

Reading deeper into what someone says than what was provided is pretty idiotic, IMO.

I had a neighbor who used his as a workhorse. They aren’t for me, but it seems to be a well made car.

I made my point. All the while stating:

I could’ve gotten something way newer

So, what was your point? 🤔

This is why I own a ‘79. I could’ve gotten something way newer, but it was a great price for a reliable machine and it’s in great condition. Easy to work on if need be and I can’t be stopped from driving it. Wish I would’ve thought about the lack of airbags, but what’s a drive without a little(lot of) danger?

I never said you were stupid, I said you sound stupid. If I need anything other than a basic toolkit and replacement pads to change my brakes, that’s a problem to me. And yes, I do know what an EPB is, and I don’t like them. Like a lot of electronic systems, they can fail. I’ve driven a car that automatically engages the EPB when put in park and turning it off rarely worked as intended.

Who’s stupid now? Neither of us, but you still sound stupid.

You sound pretty stupid. Even if you were right, this is wildly unnecessary to go through to change brakes. I’ve been changing my own brakes since I learned to drive and have never had to touch anything other than the wheels and brake pedals. Your take is wild.

Tastes like heaven for this jack off. 🙄

Thanks! I had no idea. I figured the resolution came from system specs. This is good to know. Although, I’m super close to just banishing the internet entirely. Tracking is getting out of hand…

Edit: corrected “vanishing” to “banishing.” Autocorrect. 🙄

Why no full screen? The second point makes sense and I might go back to using FF, but I can fathom what not going full screen accomplishes.

It does! It’s different from most of the other iterations of “glass” UI. It’s clean and (mostly) polished. I stated this in a separate comment but I’ll say it here for you, too in case you don’t read my other reply. Everyone in my circle loves it, and one person has trouble reading with it sometimes, but they are in their 70’s and still do like the Liquid Glass. They have enabled the tinting, but aren’t sure if they’re going to keep it that way. This article is kind of misleading, IMO

I think that for people with eyes worse than my own, I can see the problem. The tinted version is definitely needed. But to say it’s horrible and no one likes it is a bit extreme. Everyone in my circle loves it. One person is very happy for the tiny, but they still liked the glass even if they found it difficult to read(this person is also in their 70’s…)

I like it. 🤷🏻‍♂️