Some people have bad tastes, but good personalities. Some have bad personalities, but good tastes. And some have both of these bad.

Tech bros and corporate assholes have soft bodies, which may prevent the bottle from breaking and igniting them as intended. Throwing a brick or spraying acid in the face will work better in this case.

Crap, they’ve caught the IRL chad. 😢

For the sake of a clickbating.

I have personally witnessed a lot of bans and repressions because of this. Mainly on popular subreddits. Small ones remain relatively intact, since not much people attend them anyway. What I mean is that you can create a subreddit of like 50 people and discuss there whatever you want. But once you in a big one (100K+) - bans.

So, the rule is very old already, actually: You can’t criticize ICE on Reddit if you’re an American citizen, because of this. And you can’t criticize ICE, Israel, Trump and etc. on Reddit even if you’re are not the USA citizen - because of bans on platform.

I use 3d party indie apps for it.

This is not worth paying so much money as they are, asking for.

What is the point of premium except for not having ads anyway?

-Larry, don’t forget to turn off the lights when you leave again.

-Okay.

Larry indeed have turned of the lights this time, but not only in the office…

We don’t flex on wasting money for greedy corporations here.

Yeah, it is a great advertisement company, that lets you watch ads for free, but sometimes it shows videos that are not ads. I am glad that they are slowly patching up this issue. /s

Nice.

So, in conclusion, Reddit banned McCartney for posting images from his own concert in his own subreddit? Wild…

No wonder why some sites started to lag so hard in recent months.

Android users be like:

deleted by creator

Good then that they haven’t put explosives in it yet.

Short review directly from this source for those, who don’t want to read the whole article:

The Core Problem, Simply Stated

Technology is making distribution dramatically more efficient.

But efficiency gains are being captured by whoever controls the bottleneck — the platform, the marketplace, the search engine — rather than distributed to the workers who enable production or the consumers who fund it.

Without wages, workers can’t consume. Without consumption, capital has nowhere productive to go. So it piles up in buybacks and data centers. GDP growth slows. And we wonder why a world of genuine technological marvels feels economically stagnant for most people.

That’s the paradox.

As AI accelerates the substitution of capital for labor, the dynamics described here are likely to intensify rather than resolve. The question isn’t whether the technology works — it clearly does. The question is whether the institutions and incentive structures around it will evolve fast enough to distribute what it creates.

That’s the harder problem. And it’s not a technology problem at all.