

Deserved. 🤣


Deserved. 🤣


How do you figure? There are open source self host able solutions right now.


I dunno, they’re here to stay. Cat’s out of the box. Educators and education need to adapt. In person assessment is probably the ideal way to gauge progress and learning, but due to resources I don’t see it being practical.


Web devs who implement this won’t care about your traffic.


I actually think it’s better than that and when you set up multiple pipelines that interact and cross check it starts to ramp up. Definitely true Lemmy has its head in the sand about it though.


They’re honest at least. I respect that. Likely doesn’t care enough but if someone presents the info that would be filed under ‘neat’.


That looks like a dope project. Good luck!


You can cast from your phone to a dedicated device. Going from easiest to hardest in terms of setup:
You’d use your phone (or tablet or laptop) to load the app/website (twitch, youtube, plex, whatever) then cast to the device, which would be connected to your TV. The chromecast is the most likely to have shitty features and forced upgrades while the custom PC will leave everything up to you. The end result is no outsourcing control of your primary display (TV) and you can leave it permanently offline.


You give up control this way. Dedicated devices are superior.


Yup. All this crying about the field is a big nothing burger.


You can always get your own non-router hardware of significantly higher quality and run PFSense or similar for an end result that blows any consumer grade router out of the water. Unless they start banning all PCs this is the better way to go anyway.


Your position isn’t an informed one. A quick pubmed search on ketogenic diets and cognition shows improved and protective benefits.


The tool isn’t sentient, it operates on logical weights, and provides output that mimics its training set. LLMs are pretty impressive at what they can output, but it would be dishonest to attribute human qualities to it. There are decades of implementations of various AI techniques to varying degrees in attempts to achieve the same. It is on the technical basis, and the technical basis alone, that we should be carefully considering legal constraints.
How much a CEO is worth, how trustworthy they are, what cirlces they run in, shouldn’t be part of that consideration.
That doesn’t mean I think Altman isn’t a turd who can suck a fat one.


False equivalence. Tools are not people. We going after magic 8 balls too?


He knows his market. As others have mentioned, most casual users don’t need or care about that. Personal computing has become much more niche.


This is the computing equivalent to hoarding.


Yep. They absolutely have such clauses.


“Think of the shareholder value of firing all these people!”
This is of course problematic, but not directly the fault of the technology itself. The entire system is problematic, but that’s a digression from the effectiveness of the tech doing the job.
And the instances I’m talking about were running the ai stack and employee teams in parallel for nearly a year. The replacement wasn’t a “yeah let’s try this… whoops that didn’t work”. It was a tried and tested approach, and the employees made redundant (in the capability sense, not the firing sense, which followed afterwards).


A lot of fields don’t require doctorate levels of expertise to render effective business services. I’ve seen first hand companies replace thousands of employees and shutter divisions because their AI counterpart has been doing the job quantitatively equally, and faster. Perfect is the enemy of good enough, in most cases, as they say.
Lemmy is filled to the brim with llm haters but you’re not only a minority, you’re probably also closing doors on the future trajectory of tech in business.
You wildly misunderstood my post. Firstly, I’m not suggesting students turn their brains off. Secondly, how you learn isn’t relevant to the demonstration and application of that knowledge, which is precisely why I said in person assessment is the optimal way. You ask the student and watch them, live. This is how you defend a thesis, in front of a live panel. No tools, no cheating, just your knowledge.
What I am suggesting is that the system should adapt to the reality of the technology.