• Uruanna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Examples given in the article are:

    Historically, Valve’s policy has only banned games that are “illegal or straight-up trolling,” but that has opened the people running Steam to an endless series of subjective value judgements. For years, sporadic reports emerged of developers making anime-style smut getting ghosted by Valve – presumably for the genre’s association with high school settings and underage characters. Similarly, Steam took direct action to pull a cheap, trashy visual novel called Rape Day from the platform in 2019.

    Fuck that article BTW, pretending Steam is in the wrong and the quack would have “saved them some headaches”.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, that’s kind of what I figured they meant by “censorship”.

      If Valve doesn’t want to sell you loli visual novels, then that’s their prerogative. Can’t say that I blame them.

      • Noja@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        There’s significant overblocking, similar to how Australia banned women with small breasts from porn. But I guess that’s what people want nowdays, some are even vocal about censoring women who “dress like underage girls”, whatever that means. I’ve even seen people wanting to censor certain hairstyles, like pigtails “because that’s a little girls hairstyle”.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          There was a guy on here a few months back trying to convince people that tall guys dating short girls were pedos.

          People are stupid.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          similar to how Australia banned women with small breasts from porn

          Did they really do this though? I remember hearing about a rule like this years and years ago, and not once have I heard of it being applied

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Free speech for the maker of loli porn but not for the platform that has regular porn or lgbtq.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Lesbian porn and trans porn are the two biggest categories in porn.

          Both of those categories are lgbtq.

          Therefore, lgbtq is the most “regular” porn.

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Just LGBTQ+, I wasn’t talking about LGBTQ+ porn as separate from “regular porn”. I’m saying biggots will censor non-porn LGBTQ+ too. I am separating loli porn from “regular” porn.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Valve choosing not to sell it is literally them exercising their free speech. That’s how it works.

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Biggots are trying to shoot that down by making payment processor companies like Visa and MasterCard threaten to cut off Steam if they don’t take down evil, satanist, socialist games that recognize that minorities and LGBTQ+ even exist. Can’t shove that down the throat of good Christian kids.