• airikr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Fill me in, what have GOG done? Please link to trustworthy source(s).

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Sent a newsletter to half their customers containing “Slavic runes” (literally the logo for the SS) to promote some Slavic fantasy game

      Blue text

      Imo it’s even odds between some marketing child-left-behind googling “Slavic runes” to add to their email, and some 4channer on the team thinking they’re making a funny joke. The fact that they recognized the issue enough to know that couldn’t send the email in Germany, but sent it everywhere else anyway, makes me lean a little bit more toward the latter

      • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m confused. I have Scandinavian ancestry and understand that some of the cultural identity was appropriated by Nazis and now some extremist fuck wits. e.g. how the Hindu swastika (also often confused with sauvastika) was appropriated. But I don’t understand why that means appropriated symbols automatically = bad if they’re used in their original context?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          The main issue is that ϟϟ was both totally irrelevant to the topic besides being vaguely Slavic, and also literally the logo for the SS. In the modern day, that is its only connotation. It’s not in its original context, it’s just random runes thrown together

          • Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I’m asking both specifically about the GOG thing but also more generally. Yes, I know the SS appropriated runes for tgwit logo but I still don’t see how that automatically makes runes themselves bad. I can understand how it would be triggering for some folks and so a level of sensitivity is required (which GOG clearly failed on) but I still don’t get how appropriated symbols automatically = bad (because I’ve seen the same reactions to other ancient symbols over and over again and I’m still trying to understand it)

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              It’s bad because the SS appropriated it and stripped all other meaning from it. It’s like using the number 1488 in a username. It only means one thing, and while it’s possible to stumble into it by accident, it remains a white supremacist dogwhistle