In reality it’s supposed to be even more strict. They’re trying to get around this by having a private company own the cameras. If the government owned the cameras, they would need to get a warrant with a sufficiently narrow target from a judge before initiating electronic surveillance to track the targets’ location.

If something is really going on which justifies it, getting a warrant is trivial and probable cause is a low bar.

Email has been a decentralized federated system from the start, though I’m not aware of any community I’d trust to be a more privacy-respecting host than the available commercial offerings.

Our legal entity is in Sweden, where the law does not allow for any government to force us to spy on our users.

You’ll agree that Proton doing better would require them to move to a different country, right?

Also Mullvad doesn’t offer email accounts, does it? Seems that they couldn’t have a ‘no user data’ policy if they did since the emails would be exactly that.

F-Droid works […]

[…]

[…] that’s going to severely limit the potential userbase for that package.

I don’t think most developers who are putting their Open-Source apps on F-Droid have any minimum user threshold.

Couldn’t they also have not voted?

Someone makes a good product and then sells it in a store. Even if they do nothing else and buy no ads, a marketing wank somewhere would apparently want to take credit for the maker’s work.

Not either of those, but have you seen Brax3 phone?

Gladly go back to every site having an animated ‘under construction’ gif.

^ Obviously uneducated about the topic.

At least read up on JStark and the FGC-9.

If this is the ruling which causes you to lose trust that any legal system (not just the US’) aligns with morality, then I have to question where you’ve been all this time.

So which cameras can be used to overcome normal face coverings? https://piped.video/watch?v=yRFeS72IM6M

They have already censored entire accounts at the request of governments.

Decentralized isn’t the right word to use for a system like this.

Even though BS is going to appoint multiple different volunteer moderators (aka “Trusted Verifiers”) for this system, ultimate authority and control are entirely centralized with BS.

Check the Tech Ingredients YT channel.

Tech Ingredients YT channel made a diy microwave directed energy device to disrupt consumer drones.

More like: That could be useful, just not for (perhaps many) drones.

1km isn’t that far - the drones that were used for surveillance of Minneapolis protests in 2020 were around 6km up.

If they needed to get close for some reason, would a 1km deterrent be countered enough by approaching from directly above and using gravity for the last km?

And green lasers

Yep, one of those things the IT department takes care of and most other people just need to know to keep their devices updated.

Right? So much of this seems like people not able to tell if actions are good or bad independent of who takes the action. There’s no way their team could ever do anything bad, and anything done by the other team is automatically bad.

God forbid you try to reinforce a rare good behavior from someone who’s also done a lot of horrendous things.