Yeah I’m a real person, the name is just a reference to getting banned on Reddit many times, and then getting banned immediately across several discuss.online communities for hurting a mod’s feelings. I guess if it’s going to happen, might as well ask for it.

  • 0 Posts
  • 99 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 1st, 2025

help-circle
  • First and foremost is - just like humans - refined carbs. Inflammation, cancer, diabetes, death. Most pet foods contain insane levels of refined carbs. If you put a cat on a food like Tiki that’s literally just seafood slurry, you can reverse many health problems, but it’s 10x the cost of kibble.

    We need to get beyond feeding our animals the same ultraprocessed junk food we eat, and then we should absolutely be looking at this other stuff.

    My cats have a water fountain with a plastic sponge pre-filter, as most have. I wonder about the microplastic generation in that all the time. Plus it’s a plastic fountain because the ceramic ones are also insanely expensive and do break.







  • The point of capitalism isn’t “make a widget/sell the widget/to a customer” anymore, it’s “create market value/sell the value/shareholders are the entire point.” The widgets are just a prop in a way, the customers an abstraction. If it’s making money, if it’s growing above 3.5, we worship it. If it’s growing at thousands of percent, then it’s a god who cannot be stopped. Everything else just supports this - government, social programs, people’s life and death and joy in between - that’s all an abstraction. Shareholder value is the only thing that matters.

    This is why we must restrain capitalism with regulation, but it’s too late, it’s metastasized into its final form now.











  • In school we were taught to look for hidden meaning in word problems - checkov’s gun basically. Why is that sentence there? Because the questions would try to trick you. So humans have to be instructed, again and again, through demonstration and practice, to evaluate all sentences and learn what to filter out and what to keep. To not only form a response, but expect tricks.

    If you pre-prompt an AI to expect such trickery and consider all sentences before removing unnecessary information, does it have any influence?

    Normally I’d ask “why are we comparing AI to the human mind when they’re not the same thing at all,” but I feel like we’re presupposing they are similar already with this test so I am curious to the answer on this one.