𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠

https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/189574

EPP and ECR voted against extension, but IIRC the reason is that they wanted stricter controls instead. Most other parties were largely in favour of extending the current chat control mandate.

IIRC (but could be wrong) the EPP wanted stricter chat controls, not an extension of what was already there.

Not sure if he quit or was fired, but he updated his employment status with FUTO on LinkedIn.

I’m not so sure, a lot of the shit slinging (especially on Facebook) already has people’s real names attached to it. The worst of the worst are shameless anyway.

Rossman doesn’t work for FUTO anymore. FUTO has done some weird shit and Rossman has made some missteps in the past, but at least for him his heart seems to be in the right place. I don’t think it’s in his nature to want to screw you over so to speak.

These attacks can happen through server impersonation as well. The actual cloud servers need not be compromised, just the user’s browser has to be. This attack can then leak passwords and allow malicious parties to even gain access on the actual cloud servers apparently.

You mean a minority of the shares is held by the public, and the rest is owned by large investment parties (64% approx.).

Wouldn’t follow up or ask hard questions about combined metrics. It’s in their best interest to be enthusiastic about the numbers and push them to less critical media outlets everywhere, so the share price goes up.

I just explained that the shareholders wouldn’t do that, because that only risks the shareprice going down, which is against their interests.

At a shareholders meeting/end of year report/etc… Does matter as long as it goes public.

Because Microsoft presented numbers that chuds think sound good, so they will want to buy their shares, pushing the share price up. The people who own shares but know the numbers are fud will shut up because idiots are buying their shares at a premium. The people without shares who know better won’t buy shares, which doesn’t affect the price, and Microsoft just replies nothing to their questions.

The share price might change, as that’s largely based on feelings instead of facts. Sure they didn’t sell as well, but they presented numbers that look better (even if they aren’t) so line go up.

As a shareholder, you are financially incentivised to not question narratives the company presents if they supposedly present the company in a good light.

Suppose you do ask, the narrative unravels and the share price tanks. Congrats, you’ve just lost a buttload of money. Why would you do that?

No, best option is to applaud loudly, tout it in the press and watch useful idiots buy your shares at inflated prices.

The people who do ask the questions are the people the company doesn’t feel obliged to answer.

When the battery dies, the glasses continue to function as a traditional pair of single-vision specs, ensuring the wearer is never left in the dark or have safety compromised such as when driving or operating machinery.

I did.

Entra is derived from the Latin intrare, meaning “to enter”, which makes sense for access management/id verification software tbh.

It might cost you an arm and a leg.

In 20 years you’ll get a pill from the pharmacy to grow a new one 😋

Usually it helps but not as much as most people think. Very few people actually use a privacy focused browser, so that in and of itself is surprisingly identifying.

Why did they make the screens fold in? The Huawei Mate XT folds up in a z-shape, which imo makes more sense as you don’t need a ‘fourth’ outer display anymore. Seems more efficient that way.