Yeah, I guess that’s true

It… also costs 100k

Edit: sorry, sorry, 70k — much better

Yes, but wouldn’t it become that much easier to achieve with an effectively limitless quantity of the resource?

I mean yeah, Musk is a fucking idiot that wants to retroactively prove the book he got his name from.

At least, that’s my headcanon.

While I don’t like Musk, it’s actually never made sense to even attempt to go to Mars without taking advantage of the helium-3 stores on the Moon.

Yeah there are plenty of things logically wrong with that, but you don’t seem to be really thinking about that — I’m gonna go with misandry

Yes but Newsom says funny things about bad orange man, so he’s got my vote.

Worse for whom? The world or for humans?

You either hate human beings or you hate men, I’d seek help for both issues if I were you.

No, that I can’t answer — it would depend entirely on the level of fallout and where it happens to land.

You would need to be able to perfectly, and I mean perfectly, predict weather months in advance in order to prepare accordingly.

The reaility is that for an AI, or rather an AGI, to make the choice to launch nukes would require them to reach a point where they accept the potential loss of their own ‘life’ in exchange for whatever value a nuclear war might hold. I struggle to believe that a ‘true’ AGI would make that choice. There are far too many variables to control in comparison to a biological agent, one that likely would not affect a machine.

Now, a modern AI making that choice? Absolutely possible, the things are fucking crazy with literally no concept of what life is.

I repeat, radiation absolutely fucks electronic components. I am not talking about an emp, I am talking about radiation.

Radiation absolutely fucks electronic components

I guess I’ll know to be impressed by AI when it can distinguish things like sarcasm.

Absolutely not, I’m still just scratching my head at how something like this is allowed to happen.

Has any human ever said that they’re worried about their car getting dirtied on the way to the carwash? Maybe I could see someone arguing against getting a carwash, citing it getting dirty on the way home — but on the way there?

Like you would think it wouldn’t have the basis to even put those words together that way — should I see this as a hallucination?

Granted, I would never ask an AI a question like this — it seems very far outside of potential use cases for it (for me).

Edit: oh, I guess it could have been said by a person in a sarcastic sense

Dirtying the car on the way there?

The car you’re planning on cleaning at the car wash?

Like, an AI not understanding the difference between walking and driving almost makes sense. This, though, seems like such a weird logical break that I feel like it shouldn’t be possible.

About as comfortable as plastic wrapped in a thin sponge can be

The truth is, in regards to fertility, we have perfect eggs our entire life.

Do you somehow have knowledge that disproves aneuploid eggs?

Like, I don’t like the manosphere either, but that’s no reason to ignore science. That goes for them as well, considering that men are absolutely more likely to have mutations to their sperm factories considering… well, the nature of it.

Edit: the answer is no, they do not have that knowledge. Meaning they’re full of themselves.

Meanwhile my girlfriend and I just got done watching a 2 hour video on Japans creepiest educational video, subject of which is the Heian era of Japan. Her algorithm pulls are goated.

I think the word you’re looking for there is surreptitiously

The more people who hate Jews, the more galvanized the Israeli ethnostate becomes.