Okay, I think this is just ragebait. The real quote is:

The most lightweight way is with something like Face ID or Touch ID in the family of technology called passkeys; they actually require human presence.

Which isn’t even closely the same as requiring manual ID verification. This is about requiring PassKeys with a special biometric confirmation requirement.

https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/stats&months=24
Hopefully we’ll get some more MAU out of this.

You can have the best wallet in the world and not be private because you’ve not been using a private cryptocurrency. There’s no amount of wallet privacy features that hides the fact that a certain address holds a certain amount or that a certain transaction has been taken place on a certain point in time.
The only cryptocurrency (that I know of) that has reliably granted these guarantees is Monero, so I’d recommend to use that if what you desire is utmost privacy. However, Monero isn’t known to be a good investment, it’s a good currency (as far as I am concerned), so you might not want to hold significant amounts of money in form of Monero.

That being said, you usually only require the wallet vendor software to install apps on and update the firmware of a hardware wallet. After that you can use your hardware wallet with a compatible software of your choosing.

You can also use a paper wallet of some kind (I think there are even some metal ones, but I don’t know how you etch your seed words into them or how else they might work). You’d usually want to use some form of encryption on those though and then you got to store a secure key somewhere or rely on your brain to memorize an insecure one. Both aren’t really superior to just using a encrypted wallet file on one or more storage medias. Technically you could even apply something like Shamir’s Secret Sharing to make a M-out-of-N backup (basically multisig, but applyable to all kinds of things).

Personally I don’t think there’s a perfect solution here. You have to die one death or another.

It was the account that posted about Huntarrr yesterday or so and suggested measures against something like that which wouldn’t have been effective in the slightest. Everyone suspected them to be an AI account.

For real? Geez, that’s the bare minimum for me to consider it.

Man, the Matrix hate in this thread is real.

Neither of those supports E2EE unfortunately.

You can create a Windows To Go drive with Rufus.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1005178/share-population-using-whatsapp-europe/

The statement is in regard to the market dominanc. You’ve misread it.

Not really a lie, it just highly relies on the guarantees these chips can provide. In the past there have been multiple issues with the design or implementation of these things: https://sgx.fail/ https://tee.fail/

What other cryptographic practical applications are more worthy of his attention right now?

Like this time when they didn’t release the Signal server code for more than a year only to suddenly include a cryptocurrency that basically had a non-existent userbase but that Moxie was a chairman(?) of and nobody really knew whether or rather how much he was financially invested in. Good times /s

in TEE environment

Moxie loves these closed-source hardware enclaves. Signal servers and MobileCoin rely on this too, if I’m not mistaken.
In my opinion this not the right way to go about these things, but then again I’m not a renowned cryptohead like Moxie.

That’s a) old news and b) not user data

If you don’t require DRM maybe a Raspberry Pi and https://konstakang.com/.

Have you been living under a rock? Session has always relied on a crypto backed peer-to-peer network.

https://thingino.com/

deleted by creator

Honestly I don’t think it’s too bad. Compensating server operators will expand the network. It’s all a matter of what can be done with the coin a.k.a what will give it value.