MushuChupacabra

No problem.

Strap a gun to the drone, use your 2A freedoms.

Tell me more, Slop Boy.

That’s such an Enron thing to say.

Get the Flock out of here

I’ll consider using Mozilla once Anthony Enzor-DeMeo is fired or fucks off.

My decision has been rammed through in the exact same uncaring and unilateral way that Tony wants to ram AI down Mozilla users throats.

Wiping Palantir off the face of the earth would be a giant leap forward for humanity.

Nice work!

I’m only in favor of this if the mosquito suffers mightily somewhere along the process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3olqrQtjPfc

I just watched a tech video that reviewed two North Korean smartphones. Its autocorrect assertively blocks out or autoreplaces anything deemed unfit by the government, along with absolute control of what can be done on it, and absolute fingerprinting of anything sent.

I was reminded of this for no reason.

Microsoft AI CEO Puzzled by People Being “Unimpressed” by AI

Being that out of touch with reality should lead to immediate dismissal.

AI could replace billionaires.

AI is uncaring and unfeeling, so wouldn’t care if it was taxed appropriately.

Suleyman says he’s mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

This message has been brought to you by Microsoft, for Linux Mint.

Probably depends on the technical definition of “disease” cus obviously stuff like cancer or vitamin deficiency (scurvy) are not infections, but I’m not sure if they’re considered diseases. Do you have a demonstration of the falsehood?

You just demonstrated the falsehood in your first paragraph; playing loosely with the definition of the word disease is precisely why the statement is flat out wrong.

but I’m not sure if they’re considered diseases.

Which highlights the problem of just taking the platitude at face value. If you are not sure what is considered a disease, and what is not, then it is not reasonable to make claims about the platitude that All diseases are caused by infections.

But, maybe it will turn out he was right, someday

Doubtful, as it’s demonstrably false.

not only that, but then your pet attack dog comes along and somehow twists that into me defending pedophiles

I should actually pop back in and look at the thread, instead of just replying to my inbox. I have a pet attack dog? That’s kinda neat. I wasn’t aware, but neat nonetheless.

My point stands: when called upon to boycott Tesla, no resistance. When called upon to boycott Apple, blow up the conversation into anything but generating momentum for an Apple boycott.

It really is that reductionistic.

Why did you assume I was “nullifying action”?

Mostly your action nullifying attitude.

I shit on Tesla on a routine basis, and get zero pushback. No bitching about other vehicle producers who also are Trumpdy Dumptys…, zero.

I say don’t buy naziPhones, and people come out of the woodwork with every conceivable devil’s advocate angle, and basically maximize tangentiality.

Anything other than reinforcing the message of not buying apple:

Be mad at everyone, such that you apply pressure to no one.

You know, nullifying action.

You’re made of spare parts, aren’t ya, bud? No, therefore you should punish both, and get a phone with GrapheneOS or Linux.

So why didn’t you just say something like Look into Graphene OS or Linux in the first place?

FYI, Google is also going after ICE-spotting apps.

And therefore, ill punish neither.

Can you add anything else to nullify action, and foster an attitude of placid obedience?

Please, share more ideas to help entrench the status quo.

Thus solidifying my scorched earth policy with apple.

I don’t want your naziPhone.