Three years ago, as OpenAI’s ChatGPT was making its splashy debut, a Pew Research center survey found that nearly one in five Americans saw AI as a benefit rather than a threat. But by 2025, 43 percent of U.S. adults now believe AI is more likely to harm them than help them in the future, according to Pew.

1 in 5 people seeing something as positive is not a high approval rating in the beginning.

No need to go that far. If we just require one valid photo ID for TikTok, the children will finally be safe.

But on the other hand, it’s really polite about me knowing nothing about anything, so I think we should invest all the money on Earth into it.

The Genius Bar are much more violent these days.

Ok I’ll do 70 hour weeks as long as it promises I am also a billionaire by retirement. So that’ll be a salary of 21 million a year please.

Considering these recent developments, perhaps GapeAI

It’s also been more than 4 years since the onset of the Spanish Flu pandemic.

The “AI” can have all the fun doing my creative hobbies and I’ll go do something it can’t, like working overtime in the mines.

Mine is stronger because of the luminous epoxy resin I injected in there (pictured).

Ah but a bailout package is different. That’s a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can’t be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won’t allow it to fail.

You do realise that Labour were voted in as the progressive alternative on a bunch of pretty progressive campaign pledges right? The Online Safety Act and treating peaceful protesters as terrorists certainly weren’t what people voted for.

I would like to propose you eat my gas

You’re not going to catch me out with this one again!

If we are using the hammer analogy, let’s assume the user isn’t an expert with hammers already and is just trying to hammer in a nail to secure something to a wall. They start hammering and the nail bends and looks terrible and isn’t secure at all, but the hammer pipes up “don’t worry that’s, exactly what it should look like. Just hammer it again even harder to make sure”.

Everyone is like “oh look they made ChatGPT say something stupid, what a stupid article and writer”. Not, “ChatGPT will say stupid stuff as fact, what a stupid and underdeveloped tool”.

I think the headline would be “Illegal, Non-Safety Tested Car Disables Driver in Crash”

I’m glad that they’re acknowledging that DEI and climate change are not misinformation at least.

That’s not really evidence… humans can write shitty scripts too.

If there were evidence amd they didn’t disclose it, it would be a huge scandal considering protections against AI was a huge part of the 2023 strike.

Streaming services are soon going to be like mobile gaming. Literal tons of low effort shit copying off each other so it’s almost impossible to just browse the store and find anything with real quality.

Wasn’t The Gray Man based on a book? Yeah it was… not good, but is there evidence of AI in the script?