Nougat

But there are fewer people needing to use ATMs with all the card/tap/digital money transfer. The only time anyone is using an ATM is because they have to. And a high proportion of those people who have to use ATMs are going to be poor.

“Make ‘em wait through an ad, what are they gonna do?”

Oh god don’t tell them about ATMs.

I don’t like talking to people.

Dude has some Evil Twin look going on.

There’s like an acre of land at the Alabama-Georgia border that neither state claims based on each of their border maps. Buy it, build a house there.

Boom - nation-state.

Only if your home is a nation-state.

… the study’s participants – 12,772 civil servants in Brazil, with an average age of 52 – who were followed up for on average eight years.

That’s a really good sample size, and a plenty long follow up period, but do we know whether they’ve factored out “living in Brazil” or “being a civil servant”?

LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX

Oh, it’s not even that some other protocol is operating on 443. It’s that the underlying transport is HTTPS, just for something that’s not a website rendered in a browser by the client. Microsoft, for example, used RPC over HTTPS for Outlook connectivity to Exchange for a hot minute.

I don’t like to resort to that, but since you’ve suggested it - yeah, I’ll never hear about your concerns again. Thanks! Good job!

Please refer to my previous comment.

If you’re using Crowley to support what’s legitimate, you’re gonna have problems.

Pro tip: Posting in non-relevant places about the controversy you personally find very important - even if you’re right - is counterproductive to the very thing you want changed.

There’s lots of things that transport using HTTPS that aren’t websites in browsers.

This is related to China how?

Ideally, there should be a visitor card available to be used, with its clearances configured as appropriate for the visitor in question. Having a person hand over their own card (and PIN, if applicable) isn’t a great idea either, but it’s far better than copying that card, with or without permission (probably without, if we’re being honest).

That’s … not a legitimate use.

(quite literally) LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX

Good, but why does this read like “This is official legal notice to FACEBOOK that FACEBOOK is NOT allowed to USE my content”?

It’s almost like the problem isn’t social media, but the algorithms that put content in front of your eyeballs to keep your engagement in order to monetize you. Like a casino.