Issue isnt so much the 12 arch users that actually know what they are doing, but all the fucking posers

I was referring to how it affected website development, not UX.

From my understanding of the article the author has noting against js, just how it affects the development process and architecture choices.

Nah. im right on target, but thanks for the great insights

Yepp - it was, but that day was 11. June

That’s not a zero-day… Really dislike media that waters down or misuse terminology

No - I never coded complete websites in flash. But if I did my «upload of the whole container» would have been my deployment

Flash never got in the way the same like js. My main take from the whole piece is how it has changed the way websites are developed, to match that of traditional software development. Like the need to deploy to change some text in the footer of our website

Do the laws say you need to store this after verification? I mean a one time verification on account creation would work?

How would this affect the big players? Like MS -you buy from the European branch and they use buy from US. So hitting them with tariffs would hurt MS more than their customers?

I understand they will raise prices, but its not like with physical goods where the same item is resold. They use other ways to transfer money because tax

How is this bad news? Dire situation?? They are not where they want to be with this “feature” so they delay it. Sounds like a smart move. Probably second best option to just dropping it