

This is regular scientific hedging.
This thing, even if it turns out to be real good, it’s years away from being a marketable product. And it’s alright! It says more about sensationalism in scientific communication.


This is regular scientific hedging.
This thing, even if it turns out to be real good, it’s years away from being a marketable product. And it’s alright! It says more about sensationalism in scientific communication.


Exactly. Yes, I know they claim it’s just the UI, and the sole purpose of closed-source code is to make it harder to steal innovative UI elements - but when it comes to something as sensitive as the browser, I’d like for these claims to be verifiable.


Vivaldi is in big part closed source, so we literally don’t know what it does behind the scenes


I haven’t in years anyway
Exactly why they can pull off anything like that. People who still stay with Chrome are mostly those who’ll eat it up anyway.


Nice!


Loops.
However, of a dozen instances that exist, only the main one - loops.video - functions well and serves a diversity of content. It’s still in heavy development, but technically, ActivityPub is already included.


Also PeerTube


The community push, mainly. But there seemed to be a PR campaign to capitalize on it. I don’t know if there were official adverts.


There already are quite a few instances actually, but they’re all trash tier for now, except for the dev-operated loops.video


They follow what is advertised. Fediverse, by its nature, doesn’t have money for this. There was a push for Mastodon, though.


Not much when you use an already trained model, actually.


Nah, just…make them work regular hours for a pay of an ordinary employee. They could take extra hours to earn more and demonstrate to everyone how to “work hard and earn big”. This will be cruelest punishment they can get.
Oh, and put them on a KPI and control their work productivity.


I cannot express how much peace of mind switching to Linux has granted me.
“Windows now has this horrible feature! Windows now breaks user experience! Windows has ads shoved everywhere!”
And here I am, comfortably sipping my cup of tea and watching the world burn from afar.


This.
Honestly, I’d rather not have copyright at all. The problem is not that copyright law doesn’t apply, it’s that a particular kind of wealthy businessmen are shifting our policies to fit their needs.


Mining two cryptos together is already a thing, so…


Nice! Now, this is absolutely a niche solution anyhow, but it’s an option.
Glad you found your secret sauce!


As AI-skeptical as I often am, is this really problematic? AI taking notes and then sharing them at the end of the meeting, for example, is objectively good.


Nice! Some minor design alterations would be great (sentence about news by the people for the people doesn’t have to go back and forth in width; selected section should be highlighted instead of news being seemingly selected at all times), but overall, it’s a great job!
Are there any benefits to using Bonfire over simply Mastodon/Misskey?
Open Science Network, though, is promising, but I don’t understand why the same group develops OSN and Bonfire. Am I missing something?