

The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:
- get bribes or favors from telecom equipment manufacturers.
- Create a framework to force backdoors into consumer equipment.
- Force users to use ISP provided equipment.


The only explanation that makes sense to me is that this is a law to:


Did you use ChatGPT to write this?


I believe seat belts were invented in the sixties and mandatory some time in the eighties. Unfortunately safety lags innovation.


It works great. I print mostly in PETG so bed temperature might be a factor.


I clean mine with isopropyl alcohol every other print or so.


I’m paying for a search engine “kagi” just because Google search results have more advertising than time square. It kind of sucks since we got used to search for free but at least I can get relevant results rather than advertising when I search.


I have been trying to make sense of all AI Capex announcements for a while and I don’t get it. So please help me out if you know the answer.
US Investment in 2024 ~$400b, 2025 ~$500b, 2026 ~600. Global investment 2026 1.5~$2.2t. Let’s say $2t US Investment by end of 2026. Investment will continue into the future but let’s assume that is not the case. Also that GPU will be obsolete in 5y. So, they have 60m to recoup $2t +ROI ~10%. So about $40b a month, US has a labor force of 170m. Thus, AI industry needs the equivalent of ~$240 per month per each employee. I don’t see myself or my employer paying this for AI any time soon.


We are in different times. This administration doesn’t care about warrants.


You can say the same about any technology advancement. The fire, wheel, black powder, electricity, radio, tv, internet, crypto, AI, etc. The problem doesn’t reside in the technology but in the people exploiting it for evil intentions.
Wow. This is absolutely has to be the reason. There is nothing better than a recurrent revenue stream. Look at Spotify, Netflix business model.