Started with neural networks around 2000, more recently latent diffusion models. Knowledge of art goes back two decades before that. Now stop sealioning - I’m not gonna respond to anything else you say unless its to admit you’re wrong. If you intend to keep lying, shut up instead
Literally decades of experience in both AI and art
You work for an AI company and can see no good coming from AI? What?
That’s nothing to do with my point that the article’s claim about the environmental impact is bullshit. I don’t know or care what that model is, I’ve not looked, and it’s not relevant to my point. And yeah, you haters do deserve anger as a response because you are actively making the world worse via wilful ignorance, and we know what that does because of arseholes like trump and farrage.
No. It’s risen because corporate execs think they can gouge you for money to increase the high scores in their bank accounts. Increased demand means they’d be selling more which would mean more profits or even your bills decreasing if they were being fair. As usual it’s corps and billionaires that are the problem
I’m calling out how stupidly and obviously disingenuous the article is. That’s not whataboutism. Do you know what disingenuous means? The article claims it has a huge environmental impact. It doesn’t.
Based on your comments and previo8us experience I don;t see a single thing I’ve said that is wrong. I also have never seen a single thing you haters have said that is right. Stop believing fearmongering youtubers
No, I’m angrily calling out bullshit that is bullshit, but you thought Terminator was a documentary and so will immediately believe anything that says AI is bad no matter now outlandish rather than actually learn anything
What for? Coming out with a fucking stupid counterpoint? Weird thing to thank someone for
Why? Because I’m not keen on lies and bullshit? I don’t work for google
The environmental impact of AI is massively overblown all the fucking time and I don’t like lies. And I do like AI
Right back at ya! Calling out bullshit agendas is not bullshit and you, know it
Chrome sucks, sure. Did you have a coherent point beyond that? No, didn’t think so.
I don’t even know what you’re getting at here. You claim my comment, which points out how disingenuous the article is, is whataboutism, then provide some whataboutism.
Claiming a tiny environmental impact is huge in order to push an agenda is bullshit and you know it
(yes I realise the irony here. But you still have nothing useful to add to the “discussion” so shut up)