Maybe, just maybe, parents shouldn’t let their kids in awful places, and also awful places shouldnt let kids in. Turns out parental controls are bullshit, and the only real answer is RTFM or dont use it at all. A business and its customers dont exist without each other, so the blame is on both sides.
All that said, the government definitely could help the parental understand and controls side of thing too using regulation.
Well, thats what you get when non-tech people try to regulate tech. At least we have correctly identified a problem, and are now trying to solve it.
Tech companies taking advantage of regulators lack of knowledge to continue abusing their customers is a different problem.
This solution might not work but we will learn and try something else or refine it until it does work, or until social media somehow isn’t predatory and doesnt need the guard rails.
Or we could focus on preventing the addiction to begin with.
Great examples include making people wait until adulthood to smoke nicotine or cannabis, or to drink alcohol.
Surely there’s always time for both the kids and parents to set aside to learn every new technology and the appropriate controls to restrict them.
And when someone says it makes far more sense to just not give their kids said technology until they are older, we have people like you arguing on behalf of the technology.
Aww poor little facebook, we dont want to hurt its fee-fees! Let’s just give it another chance! I’m sure we can trust it this time if we just learn how to use it right!
Social media does cause harm. It tricks you into thinking you are socializing with those near you when you aren’t. It tricks you into thinking people are talking in good faith, similar to in person communication. Finally, social media is a huge attack vector for scams and abuse due to the anonymity and ability to connect anywhere in the world.
All of these things produce an overwhelmingly negative social experience from social media. That wouldn’t be a problem if our defining trait wasn’t how we socialize in groups. Socializing is as important as water and food for humans.
They are going to create a success story where someone becomes a billionaire with an AI doing everything. Then idiots will chase that dream for a hundred years and fill these rich fucks bank accounts.
Ive been on linux since the 3000 series nvidia cards. PopOS works well with nvidia cards. I used bazzite for a while with no problems, then switched to cachyOS and no problems there either.
My next card will be AMD but you should be fine to use linux with nvidia right now.
The way stocks work, as soon as nvidia stops “pushing the limits” and “creating and promoting ground breaking tech” then their stock will crater, as its no longer a company with growth potential.
This means the most important thing for a business like Nvidia is to keep the hype train running, and adding cars whenever they can. Only ideas that can provide that outcome are approved.
When you consider that most people get away with a crime dozens of times at least before getting caught, then yes being caught once is enough.
Solid troll, slightly too obvious IMO. I enjoyed reading it though so you get an upvote.
Interlock devices are the bare minimum if you insist on allowing people who have proven they will drive drunk to continue to drive.
Memory sucks. Having a physical token as a reminder is very helpful.
Its because your perspectives clash. They are saying the problems you have are caused by people behaving poorly, and you are saying its because the AI is inherently flawed.
They do have a point, if I were to pick up a hammer and throw it through a window, I can’t really blame the hammer for the broken window.
I do think we have to hold each other to some higher moral standard where we put people above profit, which would reduce a lot of abuse. Its astonishing that so many programmers would justify AI use knowing it may be causing harm to many others in their field.
I dont really care if you like me, do you have anything to add to the discussion? Prove to me that most cases of ADHD aren’t just a set of poor behaviors that could be unlearned and replaced with better ones. Prove to me that those who actually have severe ADHD aren’t suffering from something else entirely.
The term ADHD has lost most real meaning and should be replaced but that would upset a hugely profitable industry that depends on it so it stays.
Why are you talking to me if you dont want to change my mind?
I’m just supposed to spontaneously come up with your idea and go with it? ADHD is mostly a bullshit excuse, whether people know it or not. If you can prove its not somehow then be my guest, otherwise kindly fuck off.
Well I don’t think people are coming to this thread looking for medical advice, so I would hope no one takes anything anyone here says and applies it to their lives without criticism.
I’d be likely to change my mind if someone could show me evidence that ADHD happens in all human populations to some degree. I have doubt’s that there are cases of ADHD among uncontacted peoples, for instance.
Well now I want to know how else we can bleed without a cut.
Maybe, I dont think anyone does. I do know the people who think they know for sure the problem and the solution are wrong though. We can keep medicating ourselves though, I’m sure the research is sound and its all been figured out.
Are we calling RSD ADHD now?
I get it, everything is ADHD. Makes sense.
Yes, and if I spend too much time on here it affects my perceptions of people in real life. I do a few other things that aren’t really healthy as well. I’m sure I could do better.