UnspecificGravity

11 person company with 65,000 subscribers to their channel. Dude pays like $3000 per subscriber. Be cheaper just to pay people to listen to him.

It literally would have been cheaper to pay every subscriber a thousand dollars to listen to him.

He has made billions of dollars of the presidency and made himself everyone’s fucking problem, probably everything that he ever wanted.

Except that your boss just found an employee it likes more than you that doesn’t cost anything. The fact that it sucks at its job isn’t immediately apparent because your boss is an idiot.

Right, you can afford to do that because the company you are using is taking a loss on the product.

For the simple reason that is is REALLY cheap to make and monetize real porn.

The only people using AI to make porn are people who wouldn’t be able to pay for it if they charged what it costs to use.

Yep. I bet the reason they never actually closed the deal with Disney is that Disney discovered that shitty Sora CG cost more than their in house systems.

That was probably what sunk the Disney deal.

Disney can already make shitty CG animation for basically nothing. What Sora did was offer a way of doing it without any real expertise, but Disney already had that. It was probably impossible for Sora to actually produce lower-tier Disney content for less than Disney is already able to do it for.

Yeah, i think they are already doing it as a pass-through with some other company.

They are probably licensing some bullshit to someone else.

Sure, until it starts flagging normal pictures with its janky AI and you get your door kicked in based on a warrant signed by Google.

Killing off bots and people making new accounts after getting banned would leave basically go one left on Reddit.

It depends a great deal on if you have access to a real-time satellite feed and know where to look.

Remember what we’ve been saying since Google started? If they aren’t charging you then you aren’t the customer, your the product.

What do you think they are selling to the Pentagon?

Why? We are paying full price for these devices and nothing in any agreement made at the time of purchase suggests that you don’t own them. Why is it necessary to meet a middle ground between “you got what you paid for” and “you didn’t”?

What is it a compromise between? People who think they own the thing they paid for and people who don’t?

Thanks for the contribution.

Are you suggesting this browser made by the Kagi corporation isn’t a corporate product?

Sure, but closed source means that you are accepting a corporate “pinky promise” instead of a claim that can actually be independently verified.

It’s really really bad at doing spreadsheet analysis. Even basic shit that I would give to an intern. At least an intern with generally just make shit up and pretend it’s not wrong even when I point it out, and if they do I get a new intern.