alaphic

“They’re saying: we don’t care about your feelings for our chatbot and you should not have had them in the first place.”

It’s a bit eerie, honestly, watching someone so very close to getting it and yet so very far away at the exact same time…

plus more.

Like… what? You can’t just say that like that and then not at least characterize the ‘more’ in some fashion…

Maybe the internet truly is… No Country for Old Men…

… The Aristocrats!

(If anyone gets this reference I’ll be what scientists are calling “fucking surprised”)

And only… checks calendar what, like 5 - 7 years after they were a thing? Great work guys, way to stay ahead of things

Also i dislike the implications and at what directions fun is beeing made.

… I’m sorry, but what in the actual incoherence is that even supposed to mean?

¿Por que no los dos?

If so, that only makes your comment all the more puzzling, honestly

Are you familiar with the term ‘tongue in cheek’? Or ‘hyperbole’? Cuz - I’m just sayin- I really doubt that even the yellow-est of rags would expect people to believe that we’re only a “bite my shiny metal ass” away from triggering a T2 style ‘Judgement Day’… I’d say it’s simply far more likely they were simply being facetious.

Now if it was NewsMax, on the other hand…

Do keep in mind, though: If you’re up for more than 4 hours, you should consult a physician… Or, in your case, an IT Specialist, I guess?

Look, I hate to have to be the one to break it to you, but ChatGPT doesn’t really look up to you, it’s just pretending

Awww did i hurt the poor wittle racist’s feelings? How sad 🤣😂

It was more denigrating, than anything, if you wanna go down that road, precious. 😋 And you seemed more than pleased to open the door to insults, so… I dunno, don’t dish it out if you can’t take it, snowflake?

And if it was just an understanding issue, I would’ve simply said you were ignorant, but at this point either you’re genuinely incapable of understanding or being purposefully obtuse. Both are pretty fucking stupid, so…

I mean, I guess? I dunno, I kinda wondered that at first, but I’m also kinda at a loss at to what other comment that could be a response to as well…? 🤷‍♂️ I mean, it seems like it’s at least in the right thread, mostly, from the context lol 😂

Science is pretty much by definition supposed to be an objective measurement of the universe, uncolored and unaffected by political or idealogical bias (those would be your “political censorship” and “funding cuts” you mentioned, since you’re apparently having trouble following along…) Since science should be objective, funding based on idealogical grounds or the political censorship of research is anathema to science, as it is by definition not objective. I’m not sure how I can make that any clearer.

I’m not sure what about any of this has to do with me making friends, but let me know how attempting to be condescending and thinking you’re clever while completely missing a simple point works out for you… Cuz I may be autistic, but you’re stupid, and I know which I’d rather be 🤣😂

Both what? Tf are you talking about??

Who are you responding to here? 🤔

So, I guess just in case you’re somehow genuinely unfamiliar with a nested comment structure (which, if so, you’ve got to explain your situation to me, because I honestly can’t think of a probable scenario in which you aren’t, yet it’s 2025 and you also have both a device with internet access and the faculties to reply to me): That was what’s known as a ‘top-level comment’, which means it wasn’t a reply to anything, but instead a comment which can be responded to that gets listed alongside other comments which can also be responded to… Any responses to these - such as your question - get listed beneath (otherwise known as being ‘nested’ under) the original comment or post, where it can be replied to in turn. Collectively, this is known as a ‘comment thread’.

Got it now? 👍

On both sides of what? What are you even talking about? And what other media, exactly, is providing not only a public mouthpiece to, but also driving steady streams of traffic directly toward, unabashed misogynists and bigots? I’ll wait… 🙄

You can definitely take your dogwhistles and white supremacist apologism and fuck right off with it tho 😁

If I had to give a single reason, it’d probably be because they’re the ones, by and large, who are not only providing a platform for the dissemination of these abhorrent views by this trash, but they’re directly profiting from it to boot… I feel like that’s honestly pretty obvious, though I’m gonna give you the benefit of the doubt here and choose to assume you’re genuinely asking and not just being facetious

I think a better question would be: Why don’t they want to?