





This is wonderfully bizarre, but informative, I had actually wondered what exactly the rules were.


Gaining a degree of real actual democracy wouldn’t hurt.


“would undermine the privacy and security of all users,”
But that’s the entire point of doing it in the first place, isn’t it?


I’m very surprised.


One reason could be that Mercurial actually is rather good.


How are we now going to find things on the internet?


I bought a small bag of cheap rice, and it didn’t help me to connect to God!


This remains a great mystery to me. As far as I can see, all they achieve is to waste time and resources for everyone involved, including themselves, without creating anything of value to anyone. It’s truly baffling.


What makes you think that I didn’t?


I too have started to receive such PRs to review and it’s soul crushing.
– I don’t understand what you were thinking here, these changes make no sense to me, could you please be so kind and explain to me why you think this would be an improvement?
– I don’t know, the LLM just suggested it.
Man, I love shorts.
No, this is not true. An independent study originally paid for and later silenced by YouTube scientifically proved that absolutely no-one likes shorts.
I’m one of the few people who enjoy YouTube Shorts.
Seek help.


Shall I pretend to be surprised?


This is an amazingly stupid court decision.


So they want us to believe that the company that knowingly profited from genocide in Myanmar also knowingly profited from child exploitation? Really? OK then, I can believe that.


I can’t see how they could manage that without slurping up your contact information.


A posting made by an organic life form, typically a human.


“Und wenn du lange in Systemd blickst, blickt Systemd auch in dich hinein.”