And at the same time I wouldn’t say “hey fuck that, duct tape is terrible! It doesn’t hold beams together, I can’t use it to tow a trailer, it’s all just pretending to stick paper together because really every sliver of duct tape just sticks to the previous piece, etc etc” But that’s the cool thing we do on Lemmy.
The ad is bad, duct tape ain’t bad.
It’s just negligence. Power tools injure and people are stupid. The technology is alluring and people make dumb mistakes. There’s no deeper motive here, and self admitting you’re not even an amateur I will just tell you that you’re giving way less credit to these models than they deserve by calling them purely probabilistic, and way more credit then they deserve by trying to assert some kind of malicious incentive by anthropic.
These bastards are hard to make, and they have a lot of layers (not like NN layers, but training steps). They are, however, definitely better at programming than you or your buddy or any commentator here, and it lures you into a false sense of security before it makes a colossal fuck up.
There is a data point missing here.
Do the same study and give some an LLM, some no LLM, and some a type A subject matter expert for reference. It may also matter if this person is a friend coworker or random passerby, but I would be willing to bet money that the same effect is present to a lesser (but still statistically significant) degree.
Maybe a future study can be further refined to build some scaffolding for more effective teaching/learning “on the job” or in general.
Sure, nature writ large is resilient and adaptable.
Individual species die off all the time. Sometimes for stupid reasons.
“Ma-gai-tees”
Not sure how you meant it, but every turn of “magaites” is overwhelmingly dumb tbf. I take and agree with your point, but try again and try harder.
Time to learn hexadecimals and how to potato I guess.
You should be all the way joking because giving this sort of agency to an LLM shows an all the way misunderstanding of what they are and how they work.
You not alone in these feelings, but just like the title of the article, they are fundamentally misguided.
The difference is when a LLM tells you, it’s news.
Besides, what are you gonna do if you ask AI how many rocks to eat? NOT eat rocks? People can’t handle responsibility like that.
Supposing the prices they charge are still less than what you would pay for the convenience of purchasing a product with no extra effort, why would you switch?
I have myself had aspirations to buy fewer things from Amazon. However. Even including stuff like this, I am happy to pay $10 extra to not have to dick around.
I hope Amazon has to pay money for this and that it hurts their business model, bit as a customer they are still scratching my itch 2 times out of 3.
I would like to remove the word “slop” from common speech for overuse. Sorry for your jack stand experience.
hunter2.h2
Why? They are so old! Besides I always liked NSYNC better.
That’s fine, I now own both and I can say objectively that LG is way worse to work with and Sony has been easy. I have money, I want a TV. I don’t want LG.
Some best buy asshole convinced me to buy LG this last time because “it’s the same screen as the bravia, but lower price so you can get the sound bar too!”. Yeah fuck that, Sony doesn’t jerk me around. WebOS doesnt even fucking WORK unless you agree to every sharing option and update. Next time I’ll just pay the extra.
Smart tube also looks like it’s working this morning.
Yeah you can’t JUST do CS anymore. Why would you hire a CS grad to do your project when you have to plan it to the end and provide rigid specifications to follow? Instead you can hire an engineer or someone from stat or data analytics that ALSO comes with a boatload of programming (and often software architecting) expertise?
It only makes sense to hire someone with a CS specialty if the problem your company solves specifically calls for that specialty. That’s is getting increasingly rare in the age of SaaS, containerization, IaaS, etc.
That’s a lot of variety in one bowl.
Thank you! I skimmed for that and gave up.
Honestly not sure. I haven’t done a side by side with plain old chromium in years.
The embedding layer post tokenization is not just a probability machine the way you’re suggesting it. You can argue that it is probabilistic with inferred sentiment, but too many people think it works like how text prediction on your phone does and that is just factually inaccurate.
Verify output of course, but saying “it doesn’t understand anything” and “probability machine” is a borderline erroneous short sell. At the level of tokens it “understands” relationships, and those relationships are not probabilistic, though they are fundamentally approximated based on a training corpus.