

I agree with him in general about AI but hot goddamn the man gives serious self-described philosopher/cult leader/grifter vibes out the wazoo.


I agree with him in general about AI but hot goddamn the man gives serious self-described philosopher/cult leader/grifter vibes out the wazoo.


What about mobile?


No but they are all over your comments, it’s like you work for RT or something. You sure do repeat basically all their points ad nauseum.


Scratch a both sideser, find Russian agitprop. Every goddamn time.


It isn’t a matter of opinion though. Hateful ideologies promote anti-social behavior, in the actively harmful to social order context, not the I don’t like being around people context. They promote social discord which is objectively bad for social order and society at large. There are objective measures here. Not all viewpoints are equally valid, and the whole idea that they are is one of the less valid ones. You’re operating under some sort of legislation=ethics and morals framework that’s flawed in incredibly fundamental ways. Any ideology that violates the social contract cannot be protected by it.
And I disagree that anyone has the right to believe whatever they want. Nobody has the right to believe the earth is flat. Nobody has the right to believe in chemtrails, or any other objectively false thing. You’re entitled to an informed educated opinion, not to reject objective reality and replace it with your own.


Refusing to allow ideologies inherently harmful to society doesn’t have anything to do with what you just said. We’re having two different conversations. Also ideologies aren’t intrinsic characteristics and thus can’t have or be denied rights, so it’s weird to make that connotation unless you just don’t understand what I’m saying.


Should have let Sherman finish the job.


You talk like a chat bot. Stop defending nazis. You’re not defending the rule of law or any of that, you’re just defending nazis. Don’t do that. Supremacist ideology is incompatible with society as they expressly intend to destroy that society. It is always correct and right morally and ethically to remove anti-social ideologies. Legality is irrelevant.


This argument does not apply to anti-social ideologies such as white supremacy that are incompatible with society.


Paradox of tolerance. It’s absolutely self defense at the society level.


Wasn’t it making csam?


Wasn’t spez the pedo sub moderator?


So Google and Amazon are spying for Israel.


Spez was the mod of a pedo sub. He’s also a white supremacist piece of dogshit.


I operate on matrix rules. Whether or not they’re bots if they’re repeating bot points they’re bots.


There’s a metric fuck ton of them here on lemmy too.
Right wing content is usually mis- and disinformation and actively dangerous to society like antivax rhetoric, literal Russian propaganda, and general hate speech. Fuck aaaaaaalll that noise.


Seriously. Eyes basically disprove intelligent design because they’re kinda shitty at what they do.


Stand for nothing, fall for everything.
Both. They’re the intellectual equivalent and ideological opposite of libertarians with equally internally inconsistent views.