flandish

ok. so I think what you see as commenter wants to call them lies is descriptive of what the corporations are pushing (as “hallucinations” but what a reasonable person would call lies)

In other words it’s a “meta” conversation that I concur with. A LLM cannot do human things obviously, but “sales” can portray them as such.

In my day to day usage I make an actual effort to refer to that stuff that is wrong from an LLM as wrong. Not with human focused words.

I concur.

“Hallucinations” are things humans do. An AI can only just be wrong. Even when it makes up data, it’s just a stochastic parrot.

indeed.

anyone else old enough to remember the rpg-camera incident?

one of the problems with america is we are so far removed from actually getting our shit kicked in at home, too. we get to sing bootlicking country songs and watch flyovers. while our brainwashed volunteers blow up children in sandy brown places.

if ONE sub base got merc’d on american soil or one land base got got in suburban nashville we’d have a HUGE turn of opinion and probably a civil war.

the owners designed it this way. they were not stupid. just monsters.

I hope this helps other victims get proper resolution.

questions that have been asked for thousands of years, actually. heck “cogito ergo sum” and all of that.

you open the acct with id. no need for the app to verify age.

and in the US, as ab example, the gov is actively targeting citizens and noncitizens without the required warrants.

so yeah. assume the worst and prepare accordingly.

Codeberg for the win.

WHAT?!

was hoping the reference was going to be recognized. :)

pro tip: there is no such thing as a fully private app or communications channel unless you are face to face with someone and in a Cone of Silence™.

can a debit card be created by someone under 18? ie does a parent have to do it then give johnny a card? can a bodega owner sell a prepaid to a minor, and can prepaids be used?

just wondering where up the chain the responsibility lies. i’m all for corps being held to task, but also parents. if i handed my kid a phone it was my responsibility.

now he had phones that he acquired. i saw them. so i know it is largely irrelevant my thoughts on chain of concern.

in short: this is a terrible tar pit of gov horseshit sold in the “protect the kids” camp but really is “build a bigger fascist state db…”

if a phone is tied to a svc acct like a telco provider- age verification should be automatic as THAT provider cannot open an acct for a child.

here is the only line that matters: “hinder its ability to compete.”

that means “to profit.”

reminder: all corporations, everywhere and in every industry, care first about profit. everything else is about how it relates to or alters profit. literally every word is a goddamned lie, sold to help protect profit.

also their logo looks like a butthole. who does that?!

when will we get a linux based phone that is not android?

nice try, uncle sam.

that’s been the plan every industrial revolution