

It’s made by the DINUM, not an outside consulting company. And the product made by the DINUM (Tchap, France Connect …) are still in use.


It’s made by the DINUM, not an outside consulting company. And the product made by the DINUM (Tchap, France Connect …) are still in use.


Yes we know that it used the Signal protocol in 2016 but there is no doubt it drifted a lot since. A lot of changes were made to Signal since and we don’t know how WhatsApp protocol evolved. You can’t assume they’re still equivalent now. And one is open source with reproducible builds while the other is not.


It’s the French common name for this, visioconférence. Why would they care about Microsoft products for this?


I’m not saying it’s not, but that’s not enough to prevent them from using that name.


It’s a French common name for this.


But that’s the French name for this: visioconférence.


The gendarmerie has had its own Linux distribution for a while now but that’s about it.
I use it. Not directly with the wero app but the integration in my bank’s app. So for me it works on rooted LineageOS (with some safetynet fix shenanigans).
Yes but ECH/ESNI have been around for some time now, even if the official spec is recent, but adoption is stil l very low.
With a VPN it’s the VPN that has access to the list of domain you visit instead of your ISP. Whether you should put your trust in your ISP or a VPN is another question.
But they’ll still see the SNI.
Reverse DNS would only show domain name, not URL. And even then a lot of websites are sharing IPs. No point in doing that when you’ve got SNI.
Even if you use encrypted DNS they’ll still be able to see the domain in the SNI. Websites using ECH are very rare.
It doesn’t matter if you click on it. The ad space auction is already done.
No, unless you browse http website. They’ll only see the domain name in the request SNI or during the DNS request.


Isn’t LTSC a thing for Windows 11? When I still had a Windows 10 on dual boot LTSC was the only usable thing for me.


Does LibreWolf add the missing API to enable Cookie AutoDelete to work? Because I thought it didn’t work since Firefox 86 and TCP/strict mode.
Also Firefox already has a way to delete cookies and storage between sessions: privacy.clearOnShutdown_v2.cookiesAndStorage. No need for an extension.


Noyb is not a media outlet.
Yes because the department of the DINUM that made it, the « Opérateur de produits interministériels » is only one of it’s many department. I can link you multiple French article that explain it was developed by the DINUM. Please research a little bit before posting, looking for skills on LinkedIn means nothing. Also the French entrepreneurs that usually get contracts for this were very angry about it.