ivn

Telegram never was the private alternative to anything, unless you took their advertisement at face value. It was always known to not use e2ee by default.

Signal is not a problem, the US gov things were very dumb users issues. It was not caused by Signal itself.

So the goalpost has not moved in years, Signal was and is still good, Telegram is only fine if you do not care about privacy.

That’s not my claim.

Lol, “do your own research”.

This is not about me but about the advice you give to people. If you give advices you need to back them up, you can’t just answer “I disagree” to contradiction.

I’m not saying you said it was precise. I’m just saying that not every layer is important, or even good.

What if there are less people using that VPN IP than using that ISP IP, now your are giving more information with a VPN than without. How do you verify the claim that a VPN does not log? Spoiler, you can’t verify, it’s just trust. You have to chose who you trust enough to give them access to the website you visit.

You’re dodging the issue. Why would an IP that’s shared and does not give precise location be as important as precise GPS location?

No, those are not “layer of abstraction” and they do not have equal importances, claiming otherwise is counter-productive. Each data does not reveal the same quantity of information and their hierarchy depends on your threat model.

I don’t think that’s true for mobile IPs since they are shared.

That’s actually vx-underground source for this post: https://xcancel.com/vxunderground/status/2032562782248349793#m

They block with DPI so DoH would not be enough.