And that was my question. Are AGI now amy more real than a year ago? Or is this narrative just just big moneys wet dream and helpful in growing public acceptance of stupidAIs.

Friedrich Merz is still trying to sneak up Trumps arse.

You missunderstood what i adked. I know very well the difference. What i don’t get is why promoting stupidAIs will “solve all problems”.

Are AI and AGI the same now? Is there a new theory of “just has to be big enough”? That would explain americas self-destructive planning of datacenters.

I for one would immediately switch on an AGI, i think even a 20% probability for a benevolent AGI is acceptable, compared with what humanity is doing.

If foreigners come along and want to tell me what i have to do and what to allow, meddle without remorse in my local politics and lastly don’t change their behaviour when suddenly i acquire power, it’s not me starting the world war. This is on the US (and also the german CxU)

I almost came reading this rant. Thanks for bringing this so much more eloquently to the point.

And every company that is relying on gsm or the apple pendant to verify anything.

Cromite sounds nice. Well, aside the fact users stand out from the rest because of using a exotic browser. But nonetheless that seems like i should give it a try.

Suicide subscription might not be the most profitable business model.

Anything more or is it about AI scare?

Systems that are put into place will get misused or it’s initial usage will get softened, loosened and then for some safety stuff re-purposed (protection of children, protection against terrorism). If it’s there already why not use it for more than just some age verification.

It’s so cruel that we debate this mainly so that network traffic can get attributed to natural persons and this is gold++ for marketing.

deleted by creator

Thats the spirit xD

Here is a list of apps that don’t work.

https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide#apps-banning-grapheneos

Ah, thanks. Much better. :)

Maybe i misunderstood what you mean with microplastic apologist… English isn’t my mothertongue.

I wonder why this article afai understand it seems to propagate to be especially careful with the microplastics topic, as if miscommunication is especially dangerous here.

Sounds like you are not interested in science and only like what you get paid for.

I had experiences like this one a lot. Most of the time what you get in Amazon cheap ist trash. All the good stuff isn’t much cheaper most of the time, 35€ instead of 40€ sounds legit. For me at least (worker, 2 Kids, most def. not rich) this ist not enough to buy from the devil thats kills all thats is good

A sensible approach.

Instead of “demonstrating a rich theory of mind” it should say: 'if fed accordingly Ai copies the argumentative and diplomatic patterns of the data origin"