

Depends on where you are on the political spectrum:
https://drewdevault.com/2025/09/24/2025-09-24-Cloudflare-and-fascists.html


Depends on where you are on the political spectrum:
https://drewdevault.com/2025/09/24/2025-09-24-Cloudflare-and-fascists.html


Ha, I thought this was an email from FairEmail at first. That would have been wild. This coming from Scam Altman, not surprising 🤷♀️


There is an official ICE account on Bluesky.


.A friend of mine said they misspelled it as SHIT phone in their own newsletter once. It is kinda an unfortunate name (not as bad as /e/ but you just can’t top that).


I’ve been eyeing Volla for a phone with Ubuntu:
https://volla.online/en/devices/
Unfortunately, not so cheap that I could just go for it for fun, so it’ll have to wait until I actually need a new phone …


I was thinking of Mirlo and Funkwhale but there are even more here:
https://forum.wedistribute.org/topic/16/current-fediverse-resources-for-musicians
Castopod might be cool, it’s mainly for podcasts but might work for you as well?


Lol, I don’t know of that’s intentional shade but that photo is of my hometown (Lübeck), which is in the state (SH) but not the capital. So they didn’t find a photo from capital (Kiel) they that was aesthetically pleasing enough to accompany the article?


This works for a lot of sites:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/consent-o-matic/


Well, just keep pumping in the billions until the bubble bursts and we can look for the next fad, to do it all over again, right?


Stealing was always a crime only for the poor, the rich have been doing it for centuries. It’s only even more blatant in this case.


Not working for me, just getting error messages when trying to redeem …


Oh, I didn’t know that. Models were people have actually actively consented to their data being used for it (not “Wikipedia is CC so it’s fine”)?


we give, we take, we give again, and we are all in this together.
No, the AI megacorps only steal and then make you pay to use their illegal and unethical services. How naive is this?


I’m pretty sure it’s “open source” (as in not os, actually and probably trained on stolen data like always?)
So the main point is that Mozilla pretends that the translations feature is based on open source data (for lack of a better term for “people have agreed that their data can be used for training”) and that’s a lie, right?