Do they actually make it better or does their marketing say so?

While Bush was a fuckwit, though less so than Trump, Bush actually let real military people make desicions on the frontlines instead of having his uneducated golf buddies decide.

Context based text prediction by classical software used to be really good 10 years ago, for example google search, excel auto fill etc.

It is a common dream now, isn’t it? :)

Scientists being sneaky

Mount Rushmore but with a QR code linking to a defunkt ad page.

I wish I had his hobby money. Currently my budget for this year is three sea shells I found on my neighbors yard and a first gen raspberry pi I stole ten years ago.

Consciousness requires having a sense of self, which implies having needs and desires that one acts to fulfill without needing prompting.

We don’t really know that much about consciousness.

It doesn’t affect just normal people, but when you make encryption weaker, the foreign state (i.e. bad actor) surveillance also benefits.

This is the thing Indon’t understand about AI. Why can’t they make a separate imput for input and processing?

That picture is not what you asked for. You should ask grok to give your money back.

Sure that’s still a lot more than the original goal of $35 computing but you can still get a basic kit for the rpi Zero 2 W for $40.

35 dollars in 2012 is 49 dollars now when taking inflation into account. You can get Pi 5 1GB model for 45 usd.

Yes, but computers are still made and computers need ram

Just watched it on firefox ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Current RAM shortage will bring good old days back :)

To be fair, humans are excellent at building anti-human tools

That would assume they care about their users

What I don’t want AI to do:

• write code for me
• write fixes for me

What I want it to do:

• find bugs and tell me about them (but still don’t fix them)

Google search was was better before, like 10 years ago

And uranium and lava