magnetosphere

My sarcastic answer is that it’s not a write-off because he’s not already rich.

My honest answer is that I don’t know, because I don’t know shit about taxes.

This is the kind of behavior I’d expect from this administration.

Yeah, but we’ve known that about people since forever. Computers are expected to be reliable.

If hallucinations aren’t a solvable problem, then either AI is impossible, or we’re going about it the wrong way.

I’m not knowledgeable enough to dispute your point. To the end user, though, the result is equally unreliable.

Until they solve the AI hallucination problem, I’ll never be able to trust it.

The fact that AMI is European will be attractive to many people

The paper’s editor had lamented how an intern pulled out of a reporting fellowship after discovering that the position required feeding notes into an AI writing tool instead of writing stories.

Power move. I wish that intern a long and successful career.

Supreme Court Tells AI Enthusiast To Get Wrecked

Choads. All of them.

He has just given himself an eighteen month deadline to succeed or lose his own job. At least, that’s how I’d interpret it if I was in a position to fire his ass.

It would be better if this didn’t happen at all, but I’d rather see headlines like this than some retiree getting scammed out of their life savings.

I need an ELI5 version of this. (Note: this comment is a critique of me, not the author or the content of the article.)

Edit: if “nerdsnipe” isn’t in the dictionary, it totally should be.

I got about a quarter way through the article before realizing that I don’t care in the slightest.

Do you need a back brace to stand up straight, buddy? Because at this point, I am certain you haven’t got a single vertebra.

Just want to make sure this line gets the attention it deserves.

The “doorman fallacy” is a major complaint I’ve had about past managers. I’d say things like “they let Excel manage the business. If there’s a cost without a painfully obvious benefit, it’ll be mindlessly cut. They put zero thought into intangible benefits. That’s why I’m always suspicious of new managers.”

I saw one of these things (or something like it) on an episode of Parks and Recreation. I thought the props department had made it. I didn’t realize it actually existed!

I like that it’s basing its behaviors on the laws of physics. No messy human language, no opinions, slants, or agendas. AI just isn’t ready (or, possibly, will never be ready) to handle that shit. Plus, it’s not stealing work created by humans under the guise of “training”.

I assume it still relies on datacenters, which are themselves ethically questionable. Still, this seems to be the “flavor” of AI that I hate the least.

I hope the province refuses to pay

“It’s 100% natural!” “So is arsenic.” …

When I see “without chemicals” I just assume it’s shorthand for “without known harmful chemicals, probably” until I carefully read the label and learn more

WHY THE FUCK ARE PEOPLE STILL EXPECTING THIS GARBAGE TO WORK? Tesla’s “full self driving” crashes have been widely covered. Is it simple ignorance? Are they not aware of the news? Is it stubbornness? Laziness? Thinking that “it won’t happen to me”? Do they sincerely believe Musk’s lies?

I know that victim blaming isn’t the answer, and that’s not what I’m doing. I just want to know what’s going on in their heads.