

This.
Being able to talk to a computer is pretty cool (to me). But I want it to be “my” computer that respects my privacy, acts in my interests and doesn’t talk to anybody else.


This.
Being able to talk to a computer is pretty cool (to me). But I want it to be “my” computer that respects my privacy, acts in my interests and doesn’t talk to anybody else.


This feels like Americans voting behavior. “The thing I liked has gone to shit, so as a protest I will take double shit with extra piss”


It looks ass on this picture. However, it kinda looks like a steamdeck without a screen which is no surprise. And I quite like the steamdeck controls…
+1 for PrusaSlicer. It’s great and I like it’s tools for minimal editing of parts: cutting, placing and scaling…


Well, one could argue if just posting a link with a title is a ‘quality’ post. But the topic is still worth a discussion so I don’t see why it should be downvoted.


I think you should not downvote a post you have a negative opinion about. If the post is worth to discuss then why should I not upvote the post and then say that I disagree in the comments. If we all down vote those posts nobody will see it (apart of those who sort by controversial) and there will be no discussion.
I’m quite happy with Mistrals https://chat.mistral.ai/chat. I have not done much research on Mistral but from the headlines I read they don’t seem like bad guys.
The general quality of the answers is slightly worse than chat gpt (IMO). But I like some features like agents and document libraries in the free tier