priapus

Pretty much lol. If I remember correctly his reason for leaving was them adding moderation tools

he left Bluesky around 2 years ago

This is true that some blurs could be undone, but the ones used in the files are definitely destructive and cannot be undone. Grok and any other image generation tool is also definitely not capable of doing it. It requires knowledge of how it was blurred so you can use the same algorithm to undo it, models simply guess what it should look like.

Agreed, using a planning phase makes a huge difference. It will break the implementation into steps, making reviewing or manually refactoring parts of the code far more easily.

This is AI generated garbage with no sources.

Fair enough. I doubt Jellyfin will ever offer something like that. Its designed to be completely self hosted and not rely on a central server, which I dont see changing.

Oh weird. I would guess a transcoding issue, maybe double check those settings to make sure you have the right config for your hardware.

Theres also Infuse, its a video player that supports jellyfin, but I think some features are behind a premium purchase.

No shot you linked to fucking sora

Swiftfin?

You could just get a domain and set up a reverse proxy. Or use Cloudflare tunnels.

No, its a desktop version of the Collabora Online suite. Its based on LibreOffice, but imo has a much better frontend and is more stable.

There’s also Collabora Office

Devs are able to include the ability to run past versions of the game. If they push an update that breaks mods without doing that, I feel like thats their own fault.

Also, even if the dev doesnt do this, there are ways to download previous versions of the game using the steam console.

And even with the large majority using bsky.app, the true decentralized nature of Bluesky is anyone can host the data server that contains the data for their account. Even if you keep using bsky.app as your frontend, your data can be kept on a self hosted PDS.

Bluesky is decentralized, its just decentralized in a different way than Fediverse apps. A lot of fediverse people assume all decentralization would look like ActivityPub, so they just say its fake decentralization rather than learning how it works. (I know because I used to do the same, then I realized how little I understood it from this great blog post, and have since learned a lot more about it.)

There is already alternative infrastructure available (i.e. Blacksky and a variety of other applications hosted using ATProto (you can see a few here: https://bsky.social/about).

You can use any of these apps while maintaining full control of your own data by running your own PDS, or using any community maintained PDS. If you already have an account on the Bluesky PDS, you can migrate it, retaining all of your data. If you dont feel like migrating yet, you can also just export your rotation key, which would allow you to maintain control of your account even in the event that the Bluesky PDS does become evil or something.

Speaking of ATProto, sprk.so is a similar upcoming app, although I think its going to be more similar to TikTok than Vine.

What doesn’t seem clear-cut? My only point here was that using Lemmy does not directly fund the creator of it.

You support one thing who’s creator has questionable views but not the other. The main difference seems to be that you like one and not the other.

You’re making assumptions about me. I use Piefed, not Lemmy. I also do not believe that this situation is enough for me to not support Framework. All I’m saying here is that supporting Framework is for the most part direct financial support, while one can easily support the Lemmy as a whole, without providing financial support to the creator with questionable views.

I don’t care to debate about whether this makes supporting Lemmy better or worse than supporting Framework. I only on what I feel is an oversight in the comparison made by the comment I originally replied to.

Thats a valid point, but I still feel its a less direct form of support, which was my point. I dont feel that it is the same as directly financially supporting a project you morally disagree with.

But not required. If I do not morally support the developer I can instead choose to financially support individual instances, or other projects like Piefed or mbin.

My point here is that comparing this situation to using Lemmy is a bad comparison. Supporting Framework is pretty much exclusively via financial support, the same is not true for Lemmy.

Using Lemmy isn’t giving that tankie money.

If you believe the threat of a company scanning a Jellyfin server in an attempt to find copyrighted media is a realistic one, then that’s fine. I do not.

your more worried about the data that secures your media more than the actual security of the media?

As I said previously, friends and family use my server. Many who are likely to fall for phishing attempts after their email is leaked in a breach like this. I believe the likelihood of them receiving a malicious email from an attacker pretending to be Plex after a breach is much higher than a company successfully scanning my server for copyrighted materials.

Edit:

Like I’ve said a few times. I agree that this should be changed. I do very much hope that Jellyfin does so, and I do feel that it’s worth warning users about. I also still find Jellyfin to be a better option for me than Plex. My own risk tolerance allows for the incredibly tiny possibility a company successfully finds media on my server.

There is no point in continuing this discussion, as we simply disagree, and that is not going to change here.