I’m not sure which one is worse, either tells me that they didn’t bother reading the message. It is hard for me to relate because I try to do my best to not send ted talk to a group chat.
Maybe I’d rather be ignored if they’re not interested.
The worst part is that I know people that will use this regularly and also know people I’d be tempted to use it with because of their walls of text that I usually ignore.
Yes and I see two reasonable reasons for that.
One is that, like in most communities, those that feel more compelled to post and comment are those that are more passionate about the topic and/or have more extreme views.
The other reason is that given the sensitive nature of the topic, without knowing the threat level of the reader I can see how one would be reluctant to go for the “good enough”.
I guess Reddit is just one more of what they wish would be a standard.
Don’t forget to also select a few shareholders for the sacrifice, those are what CEOs try to please.
Who you say you are fighting is irrelevant. It is how you do it.
The first comparison wasn’t about ideologies, it was about spying the population and the stasi took it to a whole new level.
Those governments weren’t trying to destroy nazi organizations, they were trying to destroy anything that it wasn’t them and people suffered for that.
Yeah, it would be more correct to compare the to the gestapo and the SD instead of the whole party.
Another example of the all or nothing mentality.
That’s what happens when something grows too much, at some point moderation is impossible and rules start with one intention but turn into the absurd.
I personally know a few carnivores that they wish they could shit more often than twice a week.