That’s fair. I guess it could be no different than a scientist with some grand scheme handing his plans off to others to implement.
I think I was assuming that cutting edge AI research involves more math/theory than just… bootstrapping existing tech stacks and tweaking configs.
Wouldn’t an AI researcher naturally find generative AI disadvantageous because they are attempting to develop novel tools which could not exist in the training set in the first place?
I know that bandwidth isn’t hardly the finite resource that it used to be, but I still can’t get over how amazingly wasteful it is to continuously stream live video halfway around the world just so you can… ask your glasses to describe what’s in front of you?
1000%
And TIL the phrase “violent agreement” 😆
Yeah I agree. And while the onus of that implementation is on developers to comply with the law, there is still negative impact on end users by creating those barriers.
It isn’t mandating you affirm you’re older than 18. It’s asking explicitly for your age or your birthday.
While the API then would take that data to transmit your age bracket to other systems.
This might not be drastically burdensome on an individual workstation, I’ll stand corrected on that. And it’s not disclosing your actual birthdate to anyone either (though I still feel like it should be my choice whether or not to store that information on my personal device).
In either case, we started with this “affirm your age” kind of law on various kinds of restricted websites (pornography and alcohol) and it’s easy to just lie. So now that is now morphing into more invasive age verification strategies.
I view this law as easily circumvented theater that has the aside effect of being a slippery slope toward more aggressive anti-privacy systems in the future.
Im not sure I understand your point about this law being for developers not users.
The fines may only be applied to operating system developers for failing to implement these systems… but having those systems at all still drastically impacts end users in a negative way.
Not once we get fusion reactors up and running, then we’ll be drowning in that sweet sweet helium-4
We all hate Trump but I’m pretty sure tech industry patents have been fucked for a while.
Like… Apple and Samsung sued each other over rounded corners nearly 10 years ago.
The system has been and remains broken was the point I was trying to make with my rhetorical question.
Disgust aside, how is this fucking patentable??
Very cool, thanks so much!
Fair. I’m still curious how it detects a single atom in the vacuum of space though
But how does a satellite built 50 years ago even detect the energy of that single particle in the vacuum of space? That’s mind boggling.
I bet if they solicit crowd funding to replace this grant they’d easily surpass its dollar value.
Is there an existing way to donate to the Python Foundation?
Never mind, answered my own question: https://www.python.org/psf/donations/
Certainly interesting to have an algorithm that is extremely lossy (near totally) for the majority of inputs but lossless for some weird edge cases.
That’s a great point and well articulated! Let’s see if we can expand on this together
What do you think AI voices were trained off of?
15 years. 15 years. She got one of your kids got you for 15 years
I already deleted the app from my phone once they introduced modal overlay ads that you have to dismiss