I am pretty sure 90% of the people using the Internet don’t know what an IP address is.

Yes, the original bbc article this one is referring to is much less clickbaity:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwy87wqz0q9o

Problem is they are probably from the US which doesn’t really have a public healthcare system.

There’s a difference in making an educated guess in a system with known rules or unknown rules.

But the point is you can actually calculate everything and have all the information. Medicine is always about incomplete information, either because the data isn’t there or certain things aren’t even known.

And it clearly would be necessary because even these higly sophisticated models would only look for what they are trained for and will have a lot of arbitrary/non relevant findings.

Also someone has to take responsibility. The moment software firms are willing to take full responsibility without disclaimers I will start to believe they might be able to replace some people.

But chess is an isolated “system” with clear rules. Reality and especially medicine is so much more complicated.

The number of radiological examinations are steadily increasing so there won’t be less radiologist needed but AI is needed to cope with the increasing workload.

AI has much better sensitivity than humans (finding something out of the norm) and humans have much better specificity (basically saying what a certain finding is). So I could imagine AI screening every examination and a radiologist just goes through the findings verifying them. For specific things this is already done for years (eg pulmonary nodules).

Exactly. This “AI replacing humans” rhetoric is just marketing from the tech bros because otherwise they would only be selling very expensive tools which gives professionals a minor edge but mostly aren’t worth the (high) costs (at the moment).

I wasn’t aware balcony solar isn’t a thing in other countries because it’s everywhere here in Germany. So I was wondering what new thing they are talking about being even more easier.

I mean technically deletion just means to allow the computer to overwrite the data but until this happens it can be recovered.

No they are two completely distinct theories which only both use the word simulate but in a completely different context. And one is not more true than the other because both are just philosophical ideas.

Isn’t this kind of what Kant said? For example that time is just how our mind is “ordering” everything.

I guess the sunken cost fallacy does its part as well

Eeh didn’t you pay attention in economy 101? If you generate more supply than demand that’s a you problem. The free market will take care.

But this is about quantum entanglement isn’t it?

And just to be clear, this cannot be used to move information faster than the speed of light, ever.

Why not?

So in conclusion, it’s not AI that’s the problem it’s the legal system?

Wow, this just made me realize. If we really live in a simulation the simulation or some parameter of it could be changed anytime.

SS7 hacking can intercept your calls and text messages as well as your location just by knowing your phone number.

https://youtu.be/wVyu7NB7W6Y