

Seriously. Nana’s gonna nana.


Seriously. Nana’s gonna nana.


I also wonder how closely they can be dated. +/- 100 years is a long time and I would expect that’s a smaller interval than provided by their dating methods.
Still, Neanderthal dinner parties are nice to imagine.


Yes! The method in that video is exactly what I meant by #6.


I’ve seen a few ways for chopped onion. Chopped meaning that we want reasonably small consistent size pieces.
Root on, halved through the N & S poles, one half laid flat, vertical N/S cuts, leaving connection to root intact, cuts parallel to table almost to root, latitude cuts moving to the root end. Then a final cleanup chop of the large pieces from the root end.
Same as 1 but no parallel to table cuts. More cleanup chop at the end.
Same as 1 but radial longitudinal cuts instead of vertical.
Same as 2 but radial longitudinal cuts instead of vertical.
Same as 1 but without halving the onion first. Done in the hand.
Same as 4 but without halving the onion first. Done in the hand.
Same as 4 but root off before halving.
Same as 7 but latitude cuts before radial.
Same as 8 but latitude slices laid flat before radial cuts.
Same as 7 but root off after halving.
Same as 8 but root off after halving.
Nana method, higgledy piggledy paring knife action in the hand.
Classical western method is 1. Both 2 and 4 are very common in restaurant settings in my experience. I like method 8. Any other way feels either too fiddly or too sloppy. But I have seen each of these in action.
I make coffee every morning for me and my partner. Used to say “coffee!”
After considering the wisdom of Kevin’s “why waste time, say lot word when few word do trick?”, I started pronouncing fewer of the sounds that make up the word. Eventually it became a quiet grunt. “Uh”
In the morning that still means coffee in our house.
Needless to say, if there are cognitive consequences of a reduced word count then “me dead.”