

- The official developer verification feedback form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeN8qv6GRTztqsXy6P8P2_Q93BOIIkT2X7sOQKesQD_LCvnKw/viewform
- Android on X: https://x.com/Android




I do not consider this a win, and I will continue applying pressure where I can.
We do, and you can even run it in your browser!


Replying to myself to follow-up.
Listen, I know it’s not a popular take, but software projects and services of any size require a sizable amount of effort and time - these projects are vulnerable to acquisition, abandonment, commercialization, and enshittification without support.
I’m on Facebook because of the network effect, and if there was a way to encourage it to become a better service, the pricing is reasonable, and if I get what I want - yeah, I’d pay it.
And I’m not speaking from lack of experience - I offered my own social media service for a time that offered privacy and extra storage for a price. Not one user paid, and I had to cancel the project after losing money. Good intentions alone get you nowhere.


If it’s anything less than I want, I won’t be rewarding them at all.


I mean, do I want to give money to a billionaire? Not exactly.
On the other hand, if we don’t start supporting premium software services and open source projects, the enshitiffication trend will get worse.
(I know Facebook isn’t open source, but I’ve seen enough open source projects abandoned or enshittified due to lack of support from users.)
I have to choose among my principles, and I’m strongly against user-hostile UI/UX paradigms, enshittification, and other downward quality trends in software/services.
I pay to support my Lemmy instance, for example.


Honestly, if this reduces user-hostile UI changes for paid accounts, and I can get a chronological feed of just friend activity with original content, I’d pay it at this point.
(I know there is supposed to be a friends-only feed now, but it’s not even close to being friends-only still.)
It’s a big if, and I don’t think it will be what I want, but I’m just putting it out there that I would pay if the experience is valuable enough.


I have a similar perspective. I built my own in-home AI server because I assumed if the technology had any staying power, I better learn how it works to some degree and see if I can run it myself.
“Free”


A valid question.
It’s the official survey form from the Android Developer page on the matter: https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides


Who knows anymore? But I’d rather say something than accept it silently.


Let Google know what you think: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITkdzMxv81rJDEGGjO-UIDDY28Rz_GEVA/viewform


Let Google know what you think about this: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITkdzMxv81rJDEGGjO-UIDDY28Rz_GEVA/viewform


Let Google know what you think about this: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITkdzMxv81rJDEGGjO-UIDDY28Rz_GEVA/viewform


That’s not how distillation works if I understand what you’re trying to explain.
If you distill model A to a smaller model, you just get a smaller version of model A with the same approximate distribution curve of parameters, but fewer of them. You can’t distill Llama into Deepseek R1.
I’ve been able to run distillations of Deepseek R1 up to 70B, and they’re all censored still. There is a version of Deepseek R1 “patched” with western values called R1-1776 that will answer topics censored by the Chinese government, however.