• Archr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    However… ive read the associated analysis of the California bill that reads directly on legislative intent:

    quoting he Cali Senate Judiciary Committee analysis : file:///home/jspaleta/Downloads/202520260AB1043_Senate%20Judiciary.pdf

    Why are we listening to a person who tried to link a file directly from their downloads folder?

    Also the original post that the article is referencing on the fedora forums is suggesting that we remove all networking support from baseline linux as some way to comply/circumvent the law.

    I’m sorry, but I just can’t take anything said in that forum post seriously.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    sssssssiiiiiiiiigggggggghhhhhhhhhh

    I went with a Fedora distro because the Intel GPU drivers were less of a headache. Guess I must now find another distro…

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I would wait and be very vocal about not wanting it in the forums and stuff first.

      This isn’t decided and nothing has been added yet at the time of me writing this.

      It deserves to be ridiculed and shot down through so that it never makes it through but the problem is Red Hat is an American company.

      So I always knew this was going to happen to fedora. Still though, let’s see what happens.

        • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think they will, but I will wait and see confirmation before I go scorched earth and re install another version of Linux.

          I know ultimately that you are right though, but I stills expect pushback and I’m hoping all this shit just gets overturned or an exclusion made for FOSS at the very least.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Does Fedora has a Code of Conduct? Time to update it to either be

    • the meaningless “Be excellent to each other!” (as seen in any open source Elon Musk project),
    • or to include “protecting diverse opinions” (which is always a code word for “protecting bigotry”) instead of throwing out bigots who often don’t even meaningfully contribute to the project,
    • or to the Ten Commandments,

    if they really like the taste of the boot. Maybe they could remove “woke” elements altogether for that sweet fascist-controlled US money.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Youtube requires age verification for some content since many years.

    Out of curiosity, who here is still browsing YT without verified age?

    Who browses YT logged in with their google account and verified age?

    Too bad we don’t have pool here. I would really like to see what % of people complaining about age verification here verified their age in their google account.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve never verified my age for any operating system or website. I use YouTube logged out with an ad blocker

  • Peter1986C@piefed.europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    I have a feeling that a lot of those who replied have not really read the article, that contains some nuances. I do not like the idea of age verification, but the project leader’s proposal is apparently not even official (and more like a hypothetical in a discussion thread on their forums.

    Please read more than headlines, lol.

    • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      If youre not picky and want to use the default setups, arch install is so easy now. The script is very easy to follow and takes like 10 mins to install depending on your network speed. The only “hard” part during the install is connect to the internet. But iwctl takes care of that

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a lot easier to use than one would guessed it at first. Much easier, than wrestling with getting the right cmake/gcc versions every time on Debian the moment you don’t want to use not a 2+ years old version of something.

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I already got BSD on a spare laptop. Granted it was freeBSD and I think I might switch to OpenBSD since the latter’s foundation is Canadian and not US based.

      But yeah if they go through with this I will be uninstalling it off my gaming machine and switching to Arch 100%. I really appreciated that line about it “not being April fools” when it was introduced in their github thread.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    For solutions that back on actually “verifying” the age by requiring credit card or government ID, those suck.

    As described, this is an administrator self describing the age, which doesn’t mean much to anyone except kids of people who apply parental controls to systems their kids have access to.

    Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

    This proposal seems to be in the spirit of least intrusive means to let parents opt into this stuff if they want, with no ties to identity compromising third party/state “verification”.

    Question is whether this sort of solution that at least gives parents some chance will satisfy the lawmakers long term. For the wave of laws now, it seems to suffice to self attest age.

    • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

      They don’t require anything. You can leave that empty or just put John Doe. All that is required for an account on a Linux system is a username and a password.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Well strictly speaking the full name field is always there, but a lot of people have the full name “”.

        But less pedantic, perhaps require was the writing word, but same principle, put whatever you want in dob field, default to 1970 or something.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t think they were referring to Linux in general, I think it was specifically talking about Fedora

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not if age verification is done by a digital signature from the smart card in your government issued ID.