• CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    The article calling their moderation hands-off stuck out to me because you can’t really call Steam’s approach hands off by any means, they’ve banned some Japanese VNs before and most VN discovery guides will encourage you to use other marketplaces to avoid possible censorship, because it happens.

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Examples given in the article are:

        Historically, Valve’s policy has only banned games that are “illegal or straight-up trolling,” but that has opened the people running Steam to an endless series of subjective value judgements. For years, sporadic reports emerged of developers making anime-style smut getting ghosted by Valve – presumably for the genre’s association with high school settings and underage characters. Similarly, Steam took direct action to pull a cheap, trashy visual novel called Rape Day from the platform in 2019.

        Fuck that article BTW, pretending Steam is in the wrong and the quack would have “saved them some headaches”.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yeah, that’s kind of what I figured they meant by “censorship”.

          If Valve doesn’t want to sell you loli visual novels, then that’s their prerogative. Can’t say that I blame them.

          • Noja@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            There’s significant overblocking, similar to how Australia banned women with small breasts from porn. But I guess that’s what people want nowdays, some are even vocal about censoring women who “dress like underage girls”, whatever that means. I’ve even seen people wanting to censor certain hairstyles, like pigtails “because that’s a little girls hairstyle”.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              There was a guy on here a few months back trying to convince people that tall guys dating short girls were pedos.

              People are stupid.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              similar to how Australia banned women with small breasts from porn

              Did they really do this though? I remember hearing about a rule like this years and years ago, and not once have I heard of it being applied

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Free speech for the maker of loli porn but not for the platform that has regular porn or lgbtq.

            • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              Lesbian porn and trans porn are the two biggest categories in porn.

              Both of those categories are lgbtq.

              Therefore, lgbtq is the most “regular” porn.

              • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                Just LGBTQ+, I wasn’t talking about LGBTQ+ porn as separate from “regular porn”. I’m saying biggots will censor non-porn LGBTQ+ too. I am separating loli porn from “regular” porn.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Valve choosing not to sell it is literally them exercising their free speech. That’s how it works.

              • Uruanna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Biggots are trying to shoot that down by making payment processor companies like Visa and MasterCard threaten to cut off Steam if they don’t take down evil, satanist, socialist games that recognize that minorities and LGBTQ+ even exist. Can’t shove that down the throat of good Christian kids.